|
SIDC'S
TO DIVERSIFY INTO HOUSING FINANCE
by
K.K.
Mudgil
|

Ever since
the introduction of economic reforms in the country resulting in the
deregulation of the
financial
sector, the State Level Financial Institutions have been consistently
losing their
traditional
ground and finding it extremely difficult to compete with other financial
intermediaries like commercial banks and all-India financial institutions
in so far as financing of industrial enterprises in the States was
concerned. The need for diversification in the business activities
of SIDCs has been engaging the attention of COSIDICI for quite sometime.
COSIDICI, being the apex body of State Level Financial Institutions,
had been examining the prospects of introducing certain additional
lines of activities to SIDCs to enable them to diversify their business
operations and
thus survive the onslaught of the process of liberalization and financial
sector reforms. The SIDCs were set up in the States in early sixties
and have been functioning in the country for the last more than four
decades. Operating at the grass-roots level, these development
finance institutions have played a significant role in the promotion
of industrial activities, development of backward regions, generation
of employment opportunities, besides creating industrial infrastructure
such as industrial estates, industrial parks and industrial townships
in the respective
States. As
a long-term finance provider, they have made substantial contribution
in the country's effort to industrialize. However, in the wake of
economic liberalization and financial sector reforms, the financial
sector has undergone a sea-change making it difficult for DFIs to
continue solely with their traditional role of long-term financing.
Recognizing the difficult situation they are in, the other DFIs (like
IDBI, IFCI, ICICI, etc.) have made a gradual move towards diversifying
their portfolio into other related sectors like banking, investment
banking, insurance, etc. with a clear
move towards
universal banking. Consequently, long-term loaning has become relatively
less important. In view of the emerging business enviornment, the
State Level Financial Institutions
can no longer
afford to remain away from the main stream. They must make conscious
efforts to diversify their business portfolio in order that they may
not entirely depend upon the traditional long-term lending operations.
With the shrinking margins and non-availability of cheap resources,
the cost of funds. of these institutions has been rising as compared
to commercial banks and other financial institutions rendering their
operations unviable. There is, therefore, an imperative need that
State-level financial institutions take up some other lending activity
and also undertake non-fund based operations. COSIDICI has suggested,
after a great deal of thought, that SIDCs should take up housing finance
activity by setting up housing finance subsidiaries. SIDCs have, by
and large, appreciated this proposal and expressed their eagerness
to step into this new activity.
2. At the
initiative taken by COSIDICI, a meeting of Chief Executives of SIDCs
was arranged with Shri P.P. Vora, Chairman and Managing Director,
National Housing Bank, to discuss about the feasibility and viability
of setting up housing finance subsidiaries by SIDCs and the support
provided by NHB in this direction. The meeting was held on April 24,
2001, in the National Housing Bank under the Chairmanship of Shri
P.P. Vora, CMD. Before we discuss the role played by National Housing
Bank in promoting housing finance business in the country, we consider
it necessary to briefly comment on the housing scenario in the country,
importance of housing in bringing about overall improvement in the
life-style of the citizens, role played by housing construction in
generating employment opportunities and stimulating growth of ancillary
industries connected with housing such as steel, cement, hardware,
electrical fittings, sanitary-ware, etc. etc.
3. Housing
Situation :
Housing is
one of basic human necessities. Besides, it is fundamental to people's
physical, psychological , social and economic well-being. Whether in urban
or rural settlements, shelter is the most viable expression of a country's
ability to satisfy one of the most basic needs of its people. Besides being
the basic necessity, housing plays a positive role in the economic development
of the country and social development of its people. Housing construction
is a labour-intensive activity, capable of absorbing large number of unskilled
labour. Further, housing is linked to a variety of other industries, most
of which are also labour-intensive. Investments in housing are investments
in the development of human resources, the benefits of which accrue not
only to groups and individuals, but also to the nation as a whole. The
growing shortage of dwelling units, both in urban and rural areas, with
its associated socio-economic imbalances, had assumed an alarming proportion,
which could pose a potential threat to the socio-economic fabric of the
nation. The total housing stock in the country was 148 million units in
1991 as compared with 116.7 million units in 1981. However, the usable
housing stock was only 133.8 million units in 1991 and 101.5 million units
in 1981. The usable housing stock rose by 31.9% during the period 1981-91.
In comparison, the total number of households was 153.2 million in 1991
and 123.4 million in 1981. The number of households increased by 24% during
1981-91. It has been estimated by the National Building Organisation (NBO)
of the Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India, that the usable housing
stock will grow by 23% during the period 1991-2001, while the number of
households will grow by 16.5% during the same period. Thus, the usable
housing stock is estimated to be around 164 million and the number of households
around 178 million by the year 2001. We will continue to face the problem
of shortage of housing units in the country. The housing shortage was 23.3
million units in 1981 and it came down to 22.90 million in 1991. It is
estimated that the shortage may come down to a level of 19.40 million units
by the year 2001. During the last decade, the shortage of housing stock
has been declining steadily as may be seen from the following table:-
Housing
Shortage (Estimated) in million
| YEAR |
RURAL |
URBAN |
TOTAL |
| 1997 |
13.6 |
7.6 |
21.2 |
| 1998 |
13.4 |
7.4 |
20.8 |
| 1999 |
13.2 |
7.2 |
20.4 |
| 2000 |
13.2 |
6.9 |
20.1 |
| 2001 |
12.8 |
6.6 |
19.4 |
While the
growth rate in dwellings continues to be relatively lower in the rural
areas, it has been showing increasing trend in the urban areas thereby
indicating greater tendencies of urbanization. The period has also been
witnessing an increased influx of population from the rural to urban areas
leading to unorganized settlements due to which there has been a tremendous
pressure on the infrastructure and services available in the urban areas.
The declining trend of housing shortage is more pronounced in the urban
areas than in the rural areas, indicative of the need to step up efforts
to augment housing stock in rural areas.
4. Housing
Finance :
The requirement
of funds to clear the backlog as well as to provide housing for the ever-increasing
number of households is quite enormous. For instance, the Eighth Five Year
Plan had envisaged an investment of Rs 97,530 crores in housing. The formal
sector institutions were expected to contribute Rs 25,000 crores of this
amount. The Ninth Five Year Plan envisages an outlay of
Rs 1,50,000
crores. The share of formal sector financial instititons is envisaged at
Rs 52,000 crores. Among the formal sector institutions, the share of the
housing finance companies was
Rs 5,000 cores
during the Eighth Plan and they are expected to contribute Rs 9,500 crores
during the Ninth Plan period. The funds requirement for meeting the housing
shortage in the country is, therefore, immense. The existing players may
not be sufficient if we have to increase the share of the foraml sector's
contributin in the total investmnet envisaged. There was, therefore, an
imperative need that more and more specialised institutions enter the field
of housing finance
business to
lend for housing.
Lending for
housing is considered to be safer than lending for other assets.
This is mainly because of the psychological attachment an average Indian
has to his own house. A majority of the population has to sacrifice a lot
to own a house. Having acquired the house, they would not like to default
in repayment of the housing loan. This is demonstrated by the fact that
in the housing finance sector to-day the proportion of non-performing assets
in the individual segment is very low (less than 2%) as compared to the
other sectors. The Government has also amended the National Housing Bank
Act recently to create a simpler system of recovery in cases of wilful
defaults.
5. Prospects
of housing finance business by SIDCs :
Housing finance
business has gained great prominence during the past decade. A number of
housing finance companies have been set up in the country, both in the
public and private sectors. The Govt. of India have set up the National
Housing Bank to provide refinance to the housing
finance companies
and also to develop and regulate the housing finance intermediaries on
sound and healthy lines. Most of the commercial banks have also set up
their housing finance subsidiaries. Although a large number of housing
finance companies have been set up in the country, their
operations
are, by and large, confined to metropolitan and urban centres. Their
out-reach and penetration in the rural, backward and semi-urban areas of
the country has been quite insignificant. The demand
for housing loan emerging from such areas has mostly remained unfulfilled.
The SIDCs are having strong base in the States and are very well-equipped
with the necessary staff and infrastructural facilities and functioning
through the network of their regional offices and branch offices. Since
SIDC's are owned and managed by the State Governments, they are more people-friendly
in the States and enjoy greater credibility. They are, therefore, most
suited to take up this new activity of housing finance. As has been mentioned
in preceding
paragraphs,
the shortage of housing in the country, as a whole, in rural areas in particular,
is enormous. Notwithstanding a large number of players operating in the
country for dispensing housing credit, there is a great scope for more
and more specialized institutions to step into the field for catering to
the housing finance requirements of people in the semi-urban and rural
areas. The untouched market of housing finance in semi-urban and rural
areas of the States is entirely available to SIDCs as housing finance companies
are generally reluctant to go to those areas. Since SIDCs enjoy the patronage
and support of the State Governments, they can provide housing finance
to State Government employees, employees of schools and colleges, besides
their own industrial establishments. SIDCs could also promote their own
housing projects for which credit will be available from National Housing
Bank directly in terms of the recent amendment to NHB Act. In short, there
is tremendous scope for SIDCs to enter the housing finance business by
setting up their own subsidiary.
6. Government
as a Facilitator :
The Govt.
of India has been according highest priority to the housing sector in recent
years. This has been reflected in the Union Budget for the years 1999-2000
and 2000-2001 when a number of fiscal incentives and other measures were
announced both for the providers and borrowers in the housing business
system. The recent thrust given by the Government to the housing and housing
finance sector and the various fiscal concessions offered by the Government
to the people had the desired effect and the demand for housing has picked
up significantly. The following fiscal incentives have been provided by
the Government :-
(a) The provision
of deduction of interest on account of borrowered capital in the acquisition
or construction of a house for self-occupation available under Section
24 (1) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been increased from Rs. 75,000/-
to Rs. 1,50,000/-;
(b) Ceiling
on the amount eligible for rebate on the repayment of principal of housing
loan has
been increased to Rs.20,000/- from the earlier level of Rs.10,000/-;
(c) 40% depreciation
has been allowed on new dwelling units purchased by the Corporate Sector
for its employees;
(d) Exemption
from income-tax under section 54(6) in respect of long-term capital gains
arising from the transfer of capital assets and investments in the manner
prescribed is now
available to an assessee even if he already owns a house.
Besides, the
Union Budget includes several measures in respect of rural housing. A goal
of providing 25 lakh dwelling units has been fixed. These incentives and
support measures undertaken by NHB will go a long way in reducing the cost
of housing loans and serve as an impetus to the housing industry.
7. Meeting
with CMD, National Housing Bank :
COSIDICI had
received very positive response from SIDCs for taking up the housing finance
activity and setting up a separate subsidiary for the purpose. With a view
to discussing the prospects of housing finance business in the States,
viability of setting up housing finance subsidiary, support available from
NHB, etc., a meeting of Chief Executives of SIDCs was arranged by COSIDICI
with Shri P.P. Vora, CMD, National Housing Bank, on 24th April, 2001. Chief
Executives/Senior Executives from 8 SIDCs, viz., SIPCOT, Haryana SIDC,
J&K SIDC KSIIDC, PICUP, RIICO and SICOM, had participated in the meeting.
The CMD NHB, Shri P.P. Vora, during the course of his long address to the
participants, highlighted the viability of the housing finance business
and the tremendous scope for enlarging the housing finance outlets in the
country to meet the growing demand for housing finance. He indicated that
Govt. of India have accorded the highest priority to providing housing
in the rural areas of the country and the National Housing Bank have formulated
a special scheme `Golden Jubilee Rural Housing Scheme to provide refinance
facilities to the housing finance companies at comparatively low rate of
interest for giving housing loans in the rural areas. Shri Vora emphasized
the need for more and more specialized institutions to take up housing
finance business, particularly in the urban, semi-urban and rural areas
of the States and in this context he outlined the role which State Level
Financial Institutions like SIDCs could play in dispensing housing loans
to these areas. Shri Vora explained at length the various functions of
the National Housing Bank which, inter-alia, included providing refinance
to the approved housing finance companies and also participate in the equity
of housing finance companies to the extent of Rs. one crore or 10% of the
paid up capital. Apart from providing financial assistance to housing finance
companies, the National Housing Bank performs regulatory functions to regulate
the functioning of housing finance companies relating to their deposit
acceptance activities under the NHB Act. During the course of discussion,
a number of doubts were raised by the Chief Executives relating to viability
of the housing finance business in the States and availability of resources
for setting up these subsidiaries. Shri Vora clearly stated that in view
of the emerging market environment resulting from ongoing financial sector
reforms, the housing finance subsidiary should be set up at least with
a minimum equity of Rs.20 crores and added that the resources could be
supplemented by borrowing from commercial banks, mobilising public deposits,
floating bonds and debentures and refinance from National Housing Bank.
Shri Vora underscored the point that housing finance is a long-term lending
activity and invariably the resources available are for short term. This
could result into mis-match of assets and liabilities which needs to be
managed effectively. In conclusion, Shri Vora welcomed the entry of SIDCs
in the housing finance arena and assured the Chief Executives of SIDCs
that NHB would provide all possible help and assistance to them in setting
up the housing finance subsidiary.
|